We're kicking off Black Friday with 12 Days Of Deals! Today only, take 25% off all Stamperia products, no code necessary
User avatar

bfaretra

Cherry Bing

Re: Yes or No - 326
If it were for rheumatoid arthritis, I say yes!
Image
User avatar

imwickedwitch

Cherry Cola

Re: Yes or No - 326
No. Too much like Russian Roulette for my taste.
Becky

Image Image Image
User avatar

Sandi0805

Bowl Full of Cherries

Re: Yes or No - 326
no
 Image ImageImage
   Image
User avatar

Retiree3

Wild Cherry

Re: Yes or No - 326
No, too risky!
[
Donna-Retiree3-Proud Grandmother of Three Boys!

[highlight=#000000][/highlight]




 
User avatar

Queenie451

Cherry Berry

Re: Yes or No - 326
RitaS wrote:No. No return from fatal.
I'm with you on this one. No
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar

jcsmaestra

Cherry Cola

Re: Yes or No - 326
No - 1% of people dying from it is 1% too many.
Mary           Love is all around you.

ImageImage  Image Image Image
 
User avatar

Northern Brat

Chocolate Covered Cherry

Re: Yes or No - 326
No, cos I don't have arthritis! And still no if I did...those risks are too risky!
Leslie
2012: Goal - 75 layouts 4 mini albums 20 cards --------> Progress - layouts mini album - cards
J - /6
ImageImage
User avatar

Kitkat137

Sweet Cherry Pie

Re: Yes or No - 326
ScrapGoo wrote:Yup. I have to assume the risk would be known. Therefor the release of the drug would simply present an *option* that was not there before. Those wanting a cure could choose to take it and have that 1% risk... or not.

ETA: Now if you want to know if *I* would take it? No stinkin' way. I have horrible luck and would totally be that 1%. :?

I agree
Kat >^..^<

Image Image Image
User avatar

koala1966

Cherry Delight

Re: Yes or No - 326
EarthMom wrote:No, I would not. EVery drug has a risk vs benefit... even Tylenol. As safe as we think it is, to a certain population, primarily those with liver issues, it can be very dangerous. And believe it or not, a Tylenol overdose can even be fatal. If the guaranteed 1% fatality was for a drug that treated something life threatening, I would say go for it. But as painful and debilitation as arthritis can be (and sorry for asking nurse like questions here... also depends on what type of arthritis you are treating.... rheumatoid arthritis is far different than osteoarthritis), that is too high of a fatality rate for something that is a lifestyle illness. I would want more research and refinement of the drug.

This is exactly how I feel - I say no for arthritis, but I might say yes if it were Cancer or AIDS.
User avatar

AlwaysHappy

Cherry Cola

Re: Yes or No - 326
I had a dear friend who suffered for years from severe arthritis and the pain became so horrible with no relief in site that he couldn't handle it any longer and took his life. If a drug to cure arthritis were available, I know without a doubt he would have taken it and would probably still be alive today. I don't have arthritis and have never experienced that type of pain, but I wouldn't want to deny someone else the opportunity for a cure if they were in severe pain. There are risk that comes with all medications and also with having surgery, but I wouldn't turn down having surgery that would make my quality of life better even with a 1% risk.
Image ImageImage


User avatar

naney1952

Chocolate Covered Cherry

Re: Yes or No - 326
Yes because 1% is a small percentage when you look at the number of people that are suffering from this condition. It's a chance I think I would take.
Jane ImageImage Image
LOYAL COLTS FAN
User avatar

MLee

Cherry Cola

Re: Yes or No - 326
If you think about it, drugs that "cure" diseases generally have a 1% death rate anyway - or that chance. We just don't pay attention to it. As one suffers from degenerative arthritis but who currently is managing it... someday I would take a drug like this, side effects be damned.
Image


Post Reply

Return to “General Talk”

Information

Moderators

ACOT Employee

cron