WINNER: writerlady
"The two defendants were Siamese twins. The guilty man was set free, because to punish him would mean punishing an innocent man."
Rules: I will provide you with some verbiage....and you come up with the answer. First one with the most correct answer will win 25 ACOT points! Only 2 wins per person in Mindtrap, please!
(ha...I was wondering why there were no guesses....goofy me posted this question in game #6....so...here I go again....)
Two men were being tried for murder. The jury found one man guilty and the other innocent. The judge turned to the guilty man and said, "Even though your guilt has been established, the law compels me to set you free." How could such a bizarre judgment occur?
Forum rules
Aug 6-8
Cherry Addict
Egle ~ Let the things you love be your escape. ~
I am addicted to alphabets!....and papers.....and....
I am addicted to alphabets!....and papers.....and....
Chocolate Covered Cherry
multiply personality
Bowl Full of Cherries
they were Siamese twins?
Cherry Cola
They convicted the wrong man?
Cherry Blossom
They were identical twins and there was no way to tell them apart to find who really did it.
A Cherry on Top
They were siamese twins :)
Trish ~ It's all fun and games until somebody loses an EYELET!
Sweet Cherry Pie
the Judge felt he was guilty but the jury found him not guilty
Layouts for Jan 2011 Layouts
for Feb.2011
Cherry Bing
They were siamese twins, so he couldn't put the innocent one in jail, which meant the guilty one had to go free.
Lisa
Cherry Berry
The guilty man was found innocent.
Cherry Berry
My dh gave me the answer!
They were siamese twins. The judge couldn't punish one without punishing the other.
They were siamese twins. The judge couldn't punish one without punishing the other.
Information
Moderators
